Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2018-06-30

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Documentation/sphinx: allow "functions" with no parameters

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-06-30 11:22:05

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:05:10AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -488,14 +488,19 @@ doc: *title*
     .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c
        :doc: High Definition Audio over HDMI and Display Port
 
-functions: *function* *[...]*
+functions: *[ function ...]*
   Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
+  If no *function* if specified, the documentaion for all functions
"is specified".  "documentation".
-  Example::
+  Examples::
 
     .. kernel-doc:: lib/bitmap.c
        :functions: bitmap_parselist bitmap_parselist_user
 
+    .. kernel-doc:: lib/idr.c
+       :functions:
Is this the right syntax?  Should we rather have:

    .. kernel-doc:: lib/idr.c
       :functions: *

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help