RE: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: fsd: Re-order nodes to match coding style

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 7:48 PM
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; linux-fsd@tesla.com;
Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref]; Peter Griffin
[off-list ref]; Rob Herring [off-list ref]; Conor Dooley
[off-list ref]
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
soc@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref]
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: fsd: Re-order nodes to match coding style

Re-order several top-level and MMIO nodes to match coding style - ordering
by name or by unit address, as pointed out by dt-check-style,
e.g.:

  fsd.dtsi:981: [child-address-order] child node @10040000 out of address
order
  fsd.dtsi:315: [child-name-order] child node 'arm-pmu' out of name order
  fsd.dtsi:348: [child-name-order] child node 'clock' out of name order

While moving chunks of code, also re-order a few properties (I2S, SPI and
CAN nodes) to fix:

  fsd.dtsi:661: [property-order] property 'clocks' out of canonical order
(should sort before 'samsung,syscon-phandle')
  fsd.dtsi:936: [property-order] property 'pinctrl-names' must be placed after
'pinctrl-0'
  fsd.dtsi:936: [property-order] property 'pinctrl-names' out of canonical
order (should sort before 'samsung,spi-src-clk')

Moving several nodes already creates unreviewable commit, thus reshuffling
the properties allows to skip changing the same line twice without loss of
readability.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref]
---

Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>