Re: [PATCH] of/irq: Fix device node refcount leak in of_check_msi_parent()
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Date: 2026-09-04 07:48:00
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider: Pre-existing issues: - [High] of_msi_xlate() fails to traverse the device hierarchy when msi_np is NULL, completely breaking MSI ID mapping for callers such as the fsl-mc subsystem. - [High] msi_node reference is leaked on error path in its_v5_pci_msi_prepare() - [High] of_msi_xlate() incorrectly handles 'msi-parent' by continuing tree traversal when it mismatches. -- commit b8991c82a3994d7ebf04943226ad5d1d9490a8d4 Author: Fuad Tabba [off-list ref] of/irq: Fix device node refcount leak in of_check_msi_parent() The patch fixes a device node refcount leak in of_check_msi_parent(). It ensures that if the node was not matched in a 1:1 mapping, the reference is released correctly before returning. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260826113604.010C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ (local)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c index ec035367c9500..109c54f346479 100644 --- a/drivers/of/irq.c +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static int of_check_msi_parent(struct device_node *dev_node, struct device_node if ((*msi_node && *msi_node != msi_spec.np) || msi_spec.args_count != 0) ret = -EINVAL; - if (!ret) { + if (!ret && !*msi_node) { /* Return with a node reference held */ *msi_node = msi_spec.np; return 0;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but of_msi_xlate() seems to
incorrectly handle msi-parent mismatches.
If a device specifies an msi-parent that does not match the msi_np filter,
of_check_msi_parent() returns -EINVAL.
drivers/of/irq.c:of_msi_xlate() {
/* -ENODEV: msi-map absent -> check for msi-parent */
if (msi_np && !of_check_msi_parent(parent_dev->of_node, msi_np))
break;
}
The condition !of_check_msi_parent() evaluates to false, skipping the break
statement and allowing traversal to continue. Will this erroneously allow
traversal up the tree, potentially inheriting an incorrect msi-map from a
parent bus?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does of_msi_xlate() fail to traverse the
device hierarchy when msi_np is NULL?
When of_map_msi_id() (which calls of_map_id()) processes an absent map
property while filter_np is NULL, it returns 0 instead of an error:
drivers/of/base.c:of_map_id() {
...
map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_bytes);
if (!map) {
if (filter_np)
return -ENODEV;
/* Otherwise, no map implies no translation */
arg->args[0] = id;
arg->args_count = 1;
return 0;
}
...
}
In of_msi_xlate(), this return value of 0 triggers a break:
drivers/of/irq.c:of_msi_xlate() {
if (!of_map_msi_id(parent_dev->of_node, id_in, msi_np, &msi_spec)) {
...
/* msi-map present but no match -> stop walking */
break;
}
}
Because of_map_id() returns 0 when the map is absent, wouldn't this early
break erroneously abort the parent traversal loop on the first iteration,
breaking MSI ID mapping for callers passing a NULL msi_np?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a fwnode reference
leak on the error path in its_v5_pci_msi_prepare()?
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-its-msi-parent.c:its_v5_pci_msi_prepare() {
rid = pci_msi_map_rid_ctlr_node(domain->parent, pdev, &msi_node);
if (!msi_node)
return -ENODEV;
ret = its_translate_frame_address(msi_node, &pa);
if (ret)
return -ENODEV;
fwnode_handle_put(msi_node);
...
}
If its_translate_frame_address() fails, it returns -ENODEV without dropping
the acquired msi_node reference. Can this leak the fwnode_handle if the
frame address translation fails repeatedly during driver bind or unbind?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904073424.3855365-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev?part=1