On 5/5/2026 6:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 05/05/2026 15:27, Krishna Kurapati wrote:

quoted

On 5/5/2026 4:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 05/05/2026 12:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 10:36:57PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:

quoted

Declare the USB-C QMP PHY present on the Qualcomm Shikra platform.

Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <redacted>
---
   .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8998-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml      | 2 ++
   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>

... and then I looked at the driver. So un-reviewed. Devices are clearly
compatible. If not, explain what is not compatible.

Talos uses GCC_USB3_PRIM_PHY_AUX_CLK.

In Shikra, we are using GCC_USB3_PRIM_PHY_COM_AUX_CLK. We don't have
GCC_USB3_PRIM_PHY_AUX_CLK.

Hence, I didn't use a fallback compatible.

This still explains nothing. How different clock makes interface for SW
incompatible exactly?

So I went by the naming. AUX vs COM_AUX.

Can I use a fallback compatible and in DT vote for "COM_AUX" clock with 
clock-names mentioning "aux" ?

Regards,
Krishna,