On 24/03/2026 00:12:07+0530, Akhil R wrote:

On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 01:47:20 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:

quoted

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on next-20260320]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc4]
[cannot apply to i3c/i3c/next rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge groeck-staging/hwmon-next v7.0-rc4 v7.0-rc3 v7.0-rc2]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Akhil-R/dt-bindings-i3c-Add-mipi-i3c-static-method-to-support-SETAASA/20260322-174037
base:   next-20260320
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260318172820.13771-5-akhilrajeev%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH 04/12] i3c: master: Support ACPI enumeration
config: sparc-randconfig-002-20260322 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260323/202603230007.WOMwklQ6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260323/202603230007.WOMwklQ6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot [off-list ref]
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603230007.WOMwklQ6-lkp@intel.com/ (local)

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/i3c/master.c: In function 'i3c_master_add_i2c_boardinfo':

quoted

quoted

drivers/i3c/master.c:2449:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_dev_get_resources'; did you mean 'acpi_get_event_resources'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

    2449 |                 ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resources,
         |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                       acpi_get_event_resources

quoted

quoted

drivers/i3c/master.c:2455:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_dev_free_resource_list' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

    2455 |                 acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resources);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/i3c/master.c: In function 'i3c_master_add_acpi_dev':

quoted

quoted

drivers/i3c/master.c:2556:9: error: unknown type name 'acpi_bus_address'; did you mean 'acpi_io_address'?

    2556 |         acpi_bus_address adr;
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         acpi_io_address

quoted

quoted

drivers/i3c/master.c:2563:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_has_method'; did you mean 'acpi_has_watchdog'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

    2563 |         if (!acpi_has_method(adev->handle, "_ADR"))
         |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |              acpi_has_watchdog

quoted

quoted

drivers/i3c/master.c:2563:34: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct acpi_device'

    2563 |         if (!acpi_has_method(adev->handle, "_ADR"))
         |                                  ^~

quoted

quoted

drivers/i3c/master.c:2566:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_device_adr'; did you mean 'acpi_device_handle'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

    2566 |         adr = acpi_device_adr(adev);
         |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |               acpi_device_handle

#include <linux/acpi.h> is added in PATCH 03/12. The functions' prototypes
are present in acpi.h. I think the bot checked this patch individually,
or did I miss something?

#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h> is behind an #ifdef in acpi.h and your code
is not.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com