Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: net: wireless: mt76: clarify backoff limit format

On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 4:41 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:

On 11/02/2026 09:33, Ryder Lee wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

Why this cannot be a schema?

Well, actually, it's already a schema. This is just an expanded

Where exactly?

How 1T1ss is used across different generations is what my example above
was talking about.

Where exactly it is already a schema? Please point me line encoding this.

I think what Krzysztof is asking is why can't you have different compatible
strings for each generation (connac, connac2, connac3), and then have
conditionals in this document to describe in proper DT schema, not text,
the length requirements of each property for each generation.


ChenYu

quoted

quoted

But if it is, then this patch is redundant. Don't repeat constraints
in
free form text.

Alright then, let’s drop this change. Felix, please ignore this one.

Best regards,
Krzysztof