Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 7 authors, 2026-02-25

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad4080: add AD4880 support

From: Nuno Sá <hidden>
Date: 2026-02-09 16:43:10
Also in: linux-iio, linux-spi, lkml

On Sun, 2026-02-08 at 10:20 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 08/02/2026 10:16, Nuno Sá wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
 
   io-backends:
-    maxItems: 1
+    minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 2
Instead list the items with minItems, so the order is defined.
Also looks like we now need 'io-backend-names'.
No. Just define the order here.
Things are still not really defined on the code side (I know bindings don't care about the driver
side) but io-backend-names is a standard property and we might actually end up using it so that
we know how to map the backend to a given channel. Unless what you're saying is that in here, -names
doesn't really makes sense given that we just want n io-backends for n adc channels and having 
-names as "adc1", "adc2", "adcn" is arguably useless.

- Nuno Sá
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help