Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mq: Restore VPU G2 clock to 600MHz for 4K60fps decoding
From: Ming Qian(OSS) <hidden>
Date: 2026-02-03 07:13:38
Also in:
imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-media, linux-pm, lkml
Hi Nicolas, On 2/3/2026 3:12 AM, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
Hi, Le lundi 02 février 2026 à 13:44 -0500, Nicolas Dufresne a écrit :quoted
quoted
This doesn't sound like just a VPU issue; it's related to the display or DDR. If not displayed, do the fluster test cases yield different results at 600MHz and 300MHz?Didn't you run these tests before sending ? I can try again, but in my internal notes, I wrote: > Tested that, and everything becomes unstable That was before I figure-out the IRQ handler didn't handle exception bits that didn't stop the decoder (or dry IRQ, which strangely is common from the G2).Ran some fluster tests now. With this patch the results is not consistent anymore. Then I ran it with weston being started, and in the middle of the test the display turned black. Matches my past observation. We did reproduce this on BSP kernel too. When the display goes black, the recent hantro drivers reports: [ 827.581586] hantro-vpu 38310000.video-codec: frame decode timed out. [ 827.720201] hantro-vpu 38310000.video-codec: not all macroblocks were decoded. I have local patches to reduce the cascade of errors, so it likely survived longer then last time. I will send these patches soon. The "not all macroblocks were decoded." is triggered by a bit in the status register that is not documented in NXP TRM. I found that bit in some VC8000D documentation (the sucessor of G2). I concluded it was the same meaning after looking at the failed buffer visually, it is indeed missing couple of macroblocks near th end. Each time we see this error, the DCSS gives up and turn either black, or sometimes other color. The second case has been tracked to a DCSS Scaler underrun, the first we don't know. Fluster command ran (two threads, never completes): ./fluster.py run -d GStreamer-H.265-V4L2SL-Gst1.0 -ts JCT-VC-HEVC_V1 -j2 -t90 Nicolas
My test results for fluster differ from yours. On my end, the results for JCT-VC-HEVC_V1 are consistent at both 300MHz and 600MHz. And results remained unchanged after multiple tests. I'm not sure what caused the differences between us. Below are my test results: 600Mhz, 0.9v cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary |grep SW1C SW1C 0 1 0 unknown 900mV 0mA 825mV 1100mV cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/vpu_g2/clk_rate 600000000 ./fluster.py run -ts JCT-VC-HEVC_V1 -d GStreamer-H.265-V4L2SL-Gst1.0 -j2 -t 90 **************************************************************************************************** Running test suite JCT-VC-HEVC_V1 with decoder GStreamer-H.265-V4L2SL-Gst1.0 Using 2 parallel job(s) **************************************************************************************************** Ran 139/147 tests successfully in 505.434 secs Ran 139/147 tests successfully in 505.350 secs Ran 139/147 tests successfully in 507.540 secs 600Mhz, 1.0v cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary |grep SW1C SW1C 0 1 0 unknown 1000mV 0mA 825mV 1100mV cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/vpu_g2/clk_rate 600000000 ./fluster.py run -ts JCT-VC-HEVC_V1 -d GStreamer-H.265-V4L2SL-Gst1.0 -j2 -t 90 Ran 139/147 tests successfully in 506.901 secs 300Mhz, 0.9v cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary |grep SW1C SW1C 0 1 0 unknown 900mV 0mA 825mV 1100mV cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/vpu_g2/clk_rate 300000000 ./fluster.py run -ts JCT-VC-HEVC_V1 -d GStreamer-H.265-V4L2SL-Gst1.0 -j2 -t 90 Ran 139/147 tests successfully in 506.063 secs Downstream v4l2 driver cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary |grep SW1C SW1C 0 2 0 unknown 1000mV 0mA 825mV 1100mV cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/vpu_g2/clk_rate 600000000 ./fluster.py run -ts JCT-VC-HEVC_V1 -d GStreamer-H.265-V4L2-Gst1.0 -j2 -t 90 Ran 136/147 tests successfully in 460.435 secs Regards, Ming