Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: ExynosAutov920: Enable USB nodes
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-01-23 08:05:52
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 23/01/2026 08:59, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
Hi Krzysztof, Thank you for your feedback.quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Sent: 22 January 2026 07:05 PM To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <redacted>; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: ExynosAutov920: Enable USB nodes On 22/01/2026 14:07, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:quoted
Enable USB PHY and DWC3 USB controllers' nodes. Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <redacted> --- .../boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts | 21+++++++++++++++++++quoted
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dtsb/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts index f90f7704597c..5896dd69334a 100644--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920-sadk.dts@@ -160,15 +160,20 @@ &xtcxo { &usbdrd31_ssphy { dvdd-supply = <&dummy_regulator>; vdd18-supply = <&dummy_regulator>; + status = "okay";You just added the node in the previous patch, so why it cant be enavled there?quoted
}; &usbdrd31_hsphy { dvdd-supply = <&dummy_regulator>; vdd18-supply = <&dummy_regulator>; vdd33-supply = <&dummy_regulator>; + status = "okay"; }; &usbdrd31_dwc3 { + dr_mode = "otg"; + usb-role-switch; + role-switch-default-mode = "peripheral";Why did you add incomplete node in previous commit?The commit was added to align with the existing convention of separating node addition and enabling logic in USB configurations. This approach is
There was never such convention for Qualcomm or Samsung. Do not make up fake conventions.
referenced from commits such as:
No, it is not.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250710-resends-july-exynos990-dt-v2-5-55033f73d1b0@mentallysanemainliners.org/ (local) https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240429-usb-dts-gs101-v2-2-7c1797c9db80@linaro.org/ (local)
Just look at these commits - they add complete node override to DTS. Not half node now and half node later to the DTS file!
Please let me know if this commit to be merged in previous commit.
Just look at the commits there.
Best regards, Krzysztof