On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 04:55:56PM +0000, Alexander Koskovich wrote:
On Tuesday, January 13th, 2026 at 11:47 AM, Mukesh Ojha [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Just to clarify you said, there is no issue if you just use dtb and not use dtbo ?
And issue happen when you start using a dtbo, even a dummy one, right ?
Yeah, the cases are as follows:
dtb only (no arch_timer label) = boots
dtb (no arch_timer label) + dtbo = fails
dtb (has arch_timer label) + dtbo = boots
Yes, this is expected..some nodes in dtb is expected which
gets patched during boot up.
https://gitlab.incom.co/cm-ayn/android_kernel_ayn_kernel/-/commit/7ae6565108654991aaac9b73a2221509511e59d3
One of the reason, you will see below change to fix one of the expected
name qcom_scm in the downstream.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251217-multi_waitq_scm-v11-1-f21e50e792b8@oss.qualcomm.com/ (local)
Alex
--
-Mukesh Ojha