On 07-Jan-26 1:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 07:10:06PM +0530, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:

quoted

+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+
+        ufshc@1d84000 {

Completely messed indentation.

Why did we ask to drop the unnecessary soc node? To make it simpler.

Even if you do not believe that code should be simpler, you should
immediately spot the odd indentation.

For such trivialities you cannot get this patch merged. It's third
revision which you send carelessly.

Hi Krzysztof,

Apologies for the oversight. I missed correcting the indentation after removing the 'soc' node wrapper.
I will ensure the example is correctly indented in the next version.

Thanks,
Ram

Best regards,
Krzysztof