On Sat, Dec 06, 2025 at 07:03:32PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:40:41 +0200
Antoniu Miclaus [off-list ref] wrote:
...
quoted
+ /* Always include internal amplifier (14dB) */
+ st->gain_configs[i].path = ADL8113_INTERNAL_AMP;
+ st->gain_configs[i].gain_db = 14;
Could do this as something like:
I remember a discussion where it was against this approach due to compiler
warnings or so. However, IIRC, there was slightly different pattern, i.e.
foo[i].bar = ...
foo[i++].baz = ...
That said, I have no objection to your proposal, but we need to use it with
a good compile test coverage (clang with `make W=1` for a starter.
OTOH, the original code is robust enough...
st->gain_configs[i++] = (struct adl8113_gain_config) {
.path = ADL8113_INTERNAL_AMP,
.gain_db = 14,
};
...and doesn't require a good understanding of differences between designated
initialisers and compound literals.
st->gain_configs[i++] = (struct adl8113_gain_config) {
.path = ADL8113_INTERNAL_BYPASS,
.gain_db = -2,
};
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko