Re: [PATCH v1 0/2 RESEND] i2c: muxes: Add GPIO-detected hotplug I2C
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-10-21 13:25:31
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 09:32:24AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi Svyatoslav,quoted
Herve and Luca did not come up with anything meaningful, they provided just a few rough ideas. It will take an inconsiderate amount of timeWell, IIRC they said that your use case can be mapped onto their approach. Which is meaningful in my book.quoted
before there will be any consensus between them and schema maintainers, and even more time would be requited to settle this into schemas and implement into drivers. Why should I suffer from this? Why should changes I need be halted due to some incomplete 'ideas'? This driver uses existing i2c mux framework and fits into it just fine.I am sorry to bring you bad news, but you need to suffer because this is how development goes. If I get presented a generic solution (see Herve's mail) and a specific solution (your driver), for this case I as a maintainer will prefer the generic solution. Generic solutions need more time because there are more things to handle, of course. This is typical for development, I would say, it is not Linux or Free Software specific. I appreciate that you tackled your issue and were open to share it with the community. I see the work being done there. However, there are so many things going on independently that I can't really prevent double development from happening despite it having a high priority for me. As soon as I get aware of people working on similar issues, I connect them. That's what I did here as well. So, if you want upstream supported I2C hot-plugging, you need to wait for Luca's and Herve's work being accepted. Or provide a superior solution. Or, if you want, join the ride. You already have experience in this field (and hardware plus use case), you would be a very welcome contributor, I would say.
Agreed. What really slows things down is when there is only 1 user of a new binding. Too many times have I accepted one only for the 2nd user to show up right after accepting it and wanting something different. So now I just require more than 1 user and it is on the submitter(s) to do that. After all, it is their itch, not mine. Rob