Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-vcp-mailbox driver
From: Jjian Zhou (周建) <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-22 07:17:54
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Sat, 2025-09-20 at 23:02 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 2:02 PM Nicolas Frattaroli [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Friday, 19 September 2025 18:32:12 Central European Summer Time Jassi Brar wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 3:31 AM Chen-Yu Tsai [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 7:50 AM Jassi Brar < jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:quoted
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:12 PM Jjian Zhou < jjian.zhou@mediatek.com> wrote: .....quoted
+#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> + +struct mtk_vcp_mbox_priv {Maybe 'mtk_vcp_mbox' is a more appropriate name ?quoted
+ void __iomem *base; + struct device *dev; + struct mbox_controller mbox; + const struct mtk_vcp_mbox_cfg *cfg; + struct mtk_ipi_info ipi_recv;Maybe also have "struct mbox_chan chan[1]; " so that you don't have to allocate one during the probe. Also if you have "struct mbox_controller mbox;" as the first member, you could simply typecast that to get this structure. Something like "struct mpfs_mbox" in mailbox-mpfs.cI read somewhere that this way of subclassing is not recommended. Instead the base class should explicitly not be the first member. And then container_of() should be used. I don't remember where I read this though. But I think the explicit container_of() is easier for understanding the intent.And how does container_of() work ? :) typcasting the first member to its parent is the simplest form of container_of. -jWhich is why it's completely equivalent and since code is supposed to communicate meaning to humans, container_of should be used.Nobody is suggesting typecasting cfg, dev or anything else. Typecasting between mailbox controllers is fine and arguably easier on the eyes than using a container_of. -j
OK. How about: struct mtk_vcp_mbox *priv = (struct mtk_vcp_mbox *)chan-
con_priv;
Thanks.