RE: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: samsung: Add a hw-sensor-indices property
From: 손신 <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-15 08:51:42
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Hello, Krzysztof Kozlowski.
-----Original Message----- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzk@kernel.org] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 1:29 PM To: Shin Son <redacted>; Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [off-list ref]; Rafael J . Wysocki [off-list ref]; Daniel Lezcano [off-list ref]; Zhang Rui [off-list ref]; Lukasz Luba [off-list ref]; Rob Herring [off-list ref]; Conor Dooley [off-list ref]; Alim Akhtar [off-list ref]; Henrik Grimler [off-list ref] Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: samsung: Add a hw- sensor-indices property On 15/09/2025 06:07, Shin Son wrote:quoted
The exynosautov920 TMU requires per-sensor interrupt enablement for its critical trip points. - **samsung,hw-sensor-indices**: List of sensor indices physically monitored by this TMU block. Indicies not listed exist in the SoC register map but are not part of this TMU instanceNot much improved here. Same comment as before. That's not even correct syntax but some oddly formatted code. I asked to drop it and instead describe hardware. This is not a place to write some **code** or whatever this paragraph is about to represent.
Understood—sorry for the confusion. I'll remove the code-like formatting and replace it with a plain, hardware-focused Description as requested.
quoted
Additionally, add myself to the bindings' maintainers list, as I plan to actively work on the exynosautov920 TMU support and handle further updates in this area. I also restrict 'samsung,hw-sensor-indices' to the V920 variant. To ensure properties introduced in 'if/then' blocks are recognized, I replace 'addtionalProperties: false' with 'unevaluatedProperties: false'.No, don't do that.
Understood. I'll keep 'addtionalProperties: false' as is and promote 'samsung,hw-sensor-indices' to the common sections.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Shin Son <redacted> --- .../thermal/samsung,exynos-thermal.yaml | 40 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/samsung,exynos-thermal.yam l b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/samsung,exynos-thermal.yam l index 29a08b0729ee..448c68986b10 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/samsung,exynos-thermal.yam l+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/samsung,exynos-thermal +++ .yaml@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ title: Samsung Exynos SoC Thermal Management Unit(TMU) maintainers: - Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] + - Shin Son [off-list ref] description: | For multi-instance tmu each instance should have an alias correctly numbered @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ properties: - samsung,exynos5420-tmu-ext-triminfo - samsung,exynos5433-tmu - samsung,exynos7-tmu + - samsung,exynosautov920-tmu clocks: minItems: 1@@ -62,7 +64,7 @@ properties: minItems: 1 '#thermal-sensor-cells': - const: 0 + enum: [0, 1] vtmu-supply: description: The regulator node supplying voltage to TMU.@@ -97,6 +99,8 @@ allOf: reg: minItems: 2 maxItems: 2 + '#thermal-sensor-cells': + const: 0 - if: properties: compatible:@@ -119,6 +123,8 @@ allOf: reg: minItems: 1 maxItems: 1 + '#thermal-sensor-cells': + const: 0 - if: properties:@@ -139,8 +145,38 @@ allOf: reg: minItems: 1 maxItems: 1 + '#thermal-sensor-cells': + const: 0 -additionalProperties: false + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + const: samsung,exynosautov920-tmu + then: + properties: + clocks: + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 1 + reg: + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 1 + '#thermal-sensor-cells': + const: 1 + samsung,hw-sensor-indices: + description: + List of thermal sensor indices physically monitored by thisTMU instance.quoted
+ Indices not listed correspond to registers that exist in theSoCquoted
+ but are not connected to this TMU hardware block. + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-arrayI don't understand what is happening here with this binding. See writing schema and example-schema. Best regards, Krzysztof
Understood. I'll rework the binding to follow the 'writing schema' and 'example-schema' guidance and include these changes in v4. Thanks. Best regards, Shin Son