Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 7 authors, 2025-09-23

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: display: simple-framebuffer: Add interconnects property

From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-06-27 10:07:01
Also in: dri-devel, linux-fbdev, lkml

"Luca Weiss" [off-list ref] writes:
Hi Krzysztof,

On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 10:08 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 08:44:45AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
quoted
Document the interconnects property which is a list of interconnect
paths that is used by the framebuffer and therefore needs to be kept
alive when the framebuffer is being used.

Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/simple-framebuffer.yaml | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/simple-framebuffer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/simple-framebuffer.yaml
index 296500f9da05e296dbbeec50ba5186b6b30aaffc..f0fa0ef23d91043dfb2b220c654b80e2e80850cd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/simple-framebuffer.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/simple-framebuffer.yaml
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ properties:
   power-domains:
     description: List of power domains used by the framebuffer.
 
+  interconnects:
+    description: List of interconnect paths used by the framebuffer.
+
maxItems: 1, or this is not a simple FB anymore. Anything which needs
some sort of resources in unknown way is not simple anymore. You need
device specific bindings.
The bindings support an arbitrary number of clocks, regulators,
power-domains. Why should I artificially limit the interconnects to only
one?
I agree with Luca here. There are device specific bindings for the device
specific drivers. But this is about the generic drivers that are able to
scan out using a system provided framebuffer.

The display controller is setup by the firmware but it might need a set
of clocks, power domains, regulators, etc left enabled in order to work.

It's true that the "simple" is a misnomer, probably these drivers should
had been named sysfb and sysfbdrm, or something along those lines.
The driver code also has that support added in this series.

Regards
Luca
quoted
Best regards,
Krzysztof
-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help