Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] dt-bindings: mmc: controller: Add max-sd-hs-frequency property
From: Sarthak Garg <hidden>
Date: 2025-06-18 08:38:57
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-mmc, lkml
On 6/18/2025 1:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 18/06/2025 09:28, Sarthak Garg wrote:quoted
Introduce a new optional device tree property `max-sd-hs-frequency` to limit the maximum frequency (in Hz) used for SD cards operating in High-Speed (HS) mode. This property is useful for platforms with vendor-specific hardware constraints, such as the presence of a level shifter that cannot reliably support the default 50 MHz HS frequency. It allows the host driver to cap the HS mode frequency accordingly. Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml index 9a7235439759..1976f5f8c401 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller-common.yaml@@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ properties: minimum: 400000 maximum: 384000000 + max-sd-hs-frequency: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + description: | + Maximum frequency (in Hz) to be used for SD cards operating in + High-Speed (HS) mode. This is useful for platforms with vendor-specific + limitations, such as the presence of a level shifter that cannot support + the default 50 MHz HS frequency or other. + minimum: 400000 + maximum: 50000000This might be fine, but your DTS suggests clearly this is SoC compatible deducible, which I already said at v1. So now you send v3 which is the same as v1, so you get the same comments. Best regards, Krzysztof
Introducing this flag no longer becomes SoC compatible because as per discussions in V2 patchset with Ulf and Konrad this new property can be used by any vendor who wants to limit the HS mode frequency due to any reason. Thats why moved to this generic approach again in V3 as compared to compatible based approach in V2.