Thread (44 messages) 44 messages, 5 authors, 2025-02-12

Re: [PATCH v8 01/17] spi: add basic support for SPI offloading

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-10 17:48:06
Also in: linux-iio, linux-spi, lkml

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:11:23AM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
On 2/10/25 10:45 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:08:58PM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
quoted
quoted
+MODULE_IMPORT_NS("SPI_OFFLOAD");
quoted
This diminishes the point of the namespaces. Anybody who includes a (dangling)
header gets namespace imported, which is not good. Same for other globally
visible headers.
In this case, we specifically split up the headers so that the only time you
would ever include this header is if you need to call functions in this
namespace (i.e. struct definitions are in linux/spi/offload/types.h which
doesn't import the namespace). So this doesn't actually seem like a problem
to me.
Indeed - I can't see any case where a user would need the header without
needing the namespace.

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help