Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for
AST2700

Hi Ryan,

On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 03:51 +0000, Ryan Chen wrote:

quoted

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2024 12:12 AM
To: lee@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
conor+dt@kernel.org; joel@jms.id.au; andrew@codeconstruct.com.au;
mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; p.zabel@pengutronix.de;
devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org; Ryan Chen
[off-list ref]
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed:
support for
AST2700

On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:01:51 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:

quoted

Add reset, clk dt bindings headers, and update compatible support
for
AST2700 clk, silicon-id in yaml.

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for AST2700
      commit: 76c6217c31266e800b67a476bba59dfeb9858a90

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Hello,
Since this patch have been applied, if I still want modify I will do
the rebase and still patch base on this.
Am I right?

For example I want to modify include/dt-
bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-scu.h
I send the patchv8 [1/3] patch for aspeed,ast2700-scu.h Others [2/3],
[3/3] still progress, am I right?

I'd rebase the series on top of v6.14-rc1 and continue incrementing the series
version. You've replied to v6 here, but I see v7 at [1], so I guess v8 as you
suggest?

Yes, I am going to progress v8. Thank your advice. 

[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241028053018.2579200-1-ryan_chen@aspeedtec
h.com/

Andrew