Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 7 authors, 2025-01-19

Re: [PATCH 10/19] powerpc: dts: Add MPC8314E devicetree

From: J. Neuschäfer <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-10 16:28:34
Also in: linux-gpio, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 04:21:58PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 02/01/2025 19:31, J. Neuschäfer via B4 Relay wrote:
quoted
From: "J. Neuschäfer" <redacted>

The MPC8314E is a variant of the MPC8315E without SATA controllers.

Signed-off-by: J. Neuschäfer <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8314e.dtsi | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8314e.dtsi b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8314e.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65a96a485dded5d4918d96b38778399d2f348190
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8314e.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+// Copyright 2024 J. Neuschäfer
+#include "mpc8315e.dtsi"
+
+/* MPC8314E does not support SATA */
+/delete-node/ &sata0;
+/delete-node/ &sata1;

You should not delete nodes. That's not really maintainable code. Either
this is in base DTSI or it does not. If it does exist, then this delete
is incorrect.

If it does not delete, you are not supposed to include other SoC/device
which is not the subset of this one, so your includes are not correct.
With that in mind, I think it makes sense to structure these (up to)
four devices the other way around:

- MPC8314 as the base, because it has the least features
- MPC8314E, MPC8315E, and the currently unused MPC8315 based on MPC8314

I'll do that.

Best regards,
J. Neuschäfer
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help