Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] firmware: add Exynos ACPM protocol driver
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Date: 2025-01-06 10:20:44
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 1/6/25 9:33 AM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
Hi, Krzysztof, On 12/31/24 2:32 PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/samsung/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..750b41342174 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/firmware/samsung/Kconfig@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +config EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL + tristate "Exynos Alive Clock and Power Manager (ACPM) Message Protocol" + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST + depends on EXYNOS_MBOXIs it build time dependency? No || COMPILE_TEST?There's no build time dependency, I'll drop this line.quoted
Is it fine when EXYNOS_MBOX is a module?Yes. When the EXYNOS_MBOX module is not loaded, and one tries to load EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL module, the later will defer probe when requesting the mailbox channels, but that's fine.I'll need to select EXYNOS_MBOX, I explain why below. cutquoted
quoted
quoted
+ */ +static const struct acpm_handle *acpm_get_by_phandle(struct device_node *np, + const char *property) +{ + struct acpm_handle *handle = NULL; + struct device_node *acpm_np; + struct acpm_info *info; + + if (!np) { + pr_err("I need a device pointer\n"); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + + acpm_np = of_parse_phandle(np, property, 0); + if (!acpm_np) + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + + mutex_lock(&acpm_list_mutex); + list_for_each_entry(info, &acpm_list, node) { + if (acpm_np == info->dev->of_node) { + handle = &info->handle; + info->users++; + break; + } + } + mutex_unlock(&acpm_list_mutex); + of_node_put(acpm_np); +You also need device links and probably try_module_get. See clk.cI find these necessary too, will add them. try_module_get() must be called when the module exists and is alive, otherwise I get a NULL ptr dereference. I need a module dependency between acpm-protocol.ko and exynos-mailbox.ko. select EXYNOS_MBOX and MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: exynos-mailbox"); shall do the trick I think.quoted
quoted
clk_hw_create_clk() or of_qcom_ice_get(). Interestingly, none of them perform both operations, which I think is necessary. I think you could also avoid entire list and mutex by using platform_get_drvdata(), see of_qcom_ice_get().Using platform_get_drvdata() will simplify the code, thanks. It still assumes the platform driver exists and is alive, otherwise we get a NULL ptr dereference when getting the drvdata. But we'll be safe if I add the module dependency.
Ah, MODULE_SOFTDEP is a soft dependency, so I can't use platform_get_drvdata(), because if someone removes the exynos-mailbox.ko from the file system for example, the acpm protocol will defer and its clients still get a NULL ptr dereference when trying to get the handle (where try_module_get() and platform_get_drvdata() are called). I'm better off with the list and mutex.