Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe host support for STM32MP25
From: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@foss.st.com>
Date: 2024-12-16 09:03:58
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
Hi Manivannan, On 12/3/24 15:52, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:51:16PM +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:quoted
Add driver for the STM32MP25 SoC PCIe Gen2 controller based on the DesignWare PCIe core. Supports MSI via GICv2m, Single Virtual Channel, Single Function Signed-off-by: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@foss.st.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 12 + drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-stm32.c | 402 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-stm32.h | 15 + 4 files changed, 430 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-stm32.c create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-stm32.hdiff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig index b6d6778b0698..0c18879b604c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig@@ -389,6 +389,18 @@ config PCIE_SPEAR13XX help Say Y here if you want PCIe support on SPEAr13XX SoCs. +config PCIE_STM32 + tristate "STMicroelectronics STM32MP25 PCIe Controller (host mode)" + depends on ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST + depends on PCI_MSI + select PCIE_DW_HOST + help + Enables support for the DesignWare core based PCIe host controller + found in STM32MP25 SoC. + + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module + will be called pcie-stm32. + config PCI_DRA7XX tristatediff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile index a8308d9ea986..576d99cb3bc5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER_EP) += pcie-uniphier-ep.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST) += pcie-visconti.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_GEN4) += pcie-rcar-gen4.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_STM32) += pcie-stm32.o # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI # pci_root.c driver but don't support standard ECAM config access.diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-stm32.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-stm32.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..fa787406c0e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-stm32.c@@ -0,0 +1,402 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * STMicroelectronics STM32MP25 PCIe root complex driver. + * + * Copyright (C) 2024 STMicroelectronics + * Author: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@foss.st.com> + */ + +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/devinfo.h> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> +#include "pcie-designware.h" +#include "pcie-stm32.h" +#include "../../pci.h" + +struct stm32_pcie { + struct dw_pcie *pci; + struct regmap *regmap; + struct reset_control *rst; + struct phy *phy; + struct clk *clk; + struct gpio_desc *perst_gpio; + struct gpio_desc *wake_gpio; + unsigned int wake_irq; + bool link_is_up; +}; + +static int stm32_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) +{ + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = to_stm32_pcie(pci); + u32 ret; + + if (stm32_pcie->perst_gpio) {gpiod_set_value() will bail out if 'perst_gpio' is NULL. So no need to add a check.
OK
quoted
+ /* Make sure PERST# is asserted. */Why?
Ack. We have GPIOD_OUT_HIGH already thanks devm_gpiod_get_optional, so PERST# is asserted already at probe
quoted
+ gpiod_set_value(stm32_pcie->perst_gpio, 1); + + fsleep(PCIE_T_PERST_CLK_US); + gpiod_set_value(stm32_pcie->perst_gpio, 0);Why can't you deassert PERST# in stm32_add_pcie_port()?
Code reuse between probe and resume. (Need de-assert PERST# after the refclk is stable from both probe or resume_noirq paths). Can move this from start_link to: - probe after the phy_init - and resume_no_irq after the phy_init before dw_pcie_setup_rc
quoted
+ } + + ret = regmap_update_bits(stm32_pcie->regmap, SYSCFG_PCIECR, + STM32MP25_PCIECR_LTSSM_EN, + STM32MP25_PCIECR_LTSSM_EN); + + if (stm32_pcie->perst_gpio)It doesn't hurt to call msleep() always.
It is optional in the DT. Why wait if we don't have a reset signal ?
quoted
+ msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS); + + return ret; +} + +static void stm32_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) +{ + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = to_stm32_pcie(pci); + + regmap_update_bits(stm32_pcie->regmap, SYSCFG_PCIECR, + STM32MP25_PCIECR_LTSSM_EN, 0); + + /* Assert PERST# */ + if (stm32_pcie->perst_gpio) + gpiod_set_value(stm32_pcie->perst_gpio, 1);I don't like tying PERST# handling with start/stop link. PERST# should be handled based on the power/clock state.
I don't understand your point: We turn off the PHY in suspend_noirq(), so that seems a logical place to de-assert in resume_noirq after the refclk is ready. PERST# should be kept active until the PHY stablilizes the clock in resume. From the PCIe electromechanical specs, PERST# goes active while the refclk is not stable/
quoted
+} + +static int stm32_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev) +{ + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + if (device_may_wakeup(dev) || device_wakeup_path(dev)) + enable_irq_wake(stm32_pcie->wake_irq); + + return 0; +} + +static int stm32_pcie_resume(struct device *dev) +{ + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + if (device_may_wakeup(dev) || device_wakeup_path(dev)) + disable_irq_wake(stm32_pcie->wake_irq); + + return 0; +} + +static int stm32_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) +{ + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + stm32_pcie->link_is_up = dw_pcie_link_up(stm32_pcie->pci); + + stm32_pcie_stop_link(stm32_pcie->pci);I don't understand how endpoint can wakeup the host if PERST# gets asserted.
The stm32 PCIe doesn't support L2, we don't expect an in-band beacon for the wakeup. We support wakeup only from sideband WAKE#, that will restart the link from IRQ
quoted
+ clk_disable_unprepare(stm32_pcie->clk); + + if (!device_may_wakeup(dev) && !device_wakeup_path(dev)) + phy_exit(stm32_pcie->phy); + + return pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev); +} + +static int stm32_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) +{ + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct dw_pcie *pci = stm32_pcie->pci; + struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pci->pp; + int ret; + + /* init_state must be called first to force clk_req# gpio when noCLKREQ# Why RC should control CLKREQ#?
REFCLK is gated with CLKREQ#, So we cannot access the core without CLKREQ# if no device is present. So force it with a init pinmux the time to init the PHY and the core DBI registers
Also please use preferred style for multi-line comments: /* * ... */quoted
+ * device is plugged. + */ + if (!IS_ERR(dev->pins->init_state)) + ret = pinctrl_select_state(dev->pins->p, dev->pins->init_state); + else + ret = pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev); + + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to activate pinctrl pm state: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + if (!device_may_wakeup(dev) && !device_wakeup_path(dev)) { + ret = phy_init(stm32_pcie->phy); + if (ret) { + pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev); + return ret; + } + } + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(stm32_pcie->clk); + if (ret) + goto clk_err;Please name the goto labels of their purpose. Like err_phy_exit.
OK
quoted
+ + ret = dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); + if (ret) + goto pcie_err;This should be, 'err_disable_clk'.quoted
+ + if (stm32_pcie->link_is_up) {Why do you need this check? You cannot start the link in the absence of an endpoint?
It is an optimization to avoid unnecessary "dw_pcie_wait_for_link" if no device is present during suspend
quoted
+ ret = stm32_pcie_start_link(stm32_pcie->pci); + if (ret) + goto pcie_err; + + /* Ignore errors, the link may come up later */ + dw_pcie_wait_for_link(stm32_pcie->pci); + } + + pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev); + + return 0; + +pcie_err: + dw_pcie_host_deinit(pp); + clk_disable_unprepare(stm32_pcie->clk); +clk_err: + phy_exit(stm32_pcie->phy); + pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev); + + return ret; +} + +static const struct dev_pm_ops stm32_pcie_pm_ops = { + NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(stm32_pcie_suspend_noirq, + stm32_pcie_resume_noirq)Can you make use of dw_pcie_{suspend/resume}_noirq() APIs?
dw_pcie_suspend_noirq bails out with read_poll_timeout on ltssm = DW_PCIE_LTSS_L2_IDLE. We don't support L2.
quoted
+ SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(stm32_pcie_suspend, stm32_pcie_resume) +}; + +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops stm32_pcie_host_ops = { +}; + +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { + .start_link = stm32_pcie_start_link, + .stop_link = stm32_pcie_stop_link +}; +[...]quoted
+ if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "wakeup-source")) { + stm32_pcie->wake_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "wake", + GPIOD_IN); + if (IS_ERR(stm32_pcie->wake_gpio)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(stm32_pcie->wake_gpio), + "Failed to get wake GPIO\n"); + } + + if (stm32_pcie->wake_gpio) { + stm32_pcie->wake_irq = gpiod_to_irq(stm32_pcie->wake_gpio); + + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, + stm32_pcie->wake_irq, NULL, + stm32_pcie_wake_irq_handler, + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT, + "wake_irq", stm32_pcie); + + if (ret) + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to request WAKE IRQ: %d\n", ret); + }Can we move WAKE# gpio handling to DWC core? There is nothing STM32 specific here.
OK
quoted
+ + ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable runtime PM %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get runtime PM %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = stm32_add_pcie_port(stm32_pcie, pdev); + if (ret) { + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev); + return ret; + } + + if (stm32_pcie->wake_gpio) + device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true); + + return 0; +} + +static void stm32_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &stm32_pcie->pci->pp; + + if (stm32_pcie->wake_gpio) + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false); + + dw_pcie_host_deinit(pp); + clk_disable_unprepare(stm32_pcie->clk); + + phy_exit(stm32_pcie->phy); + + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev); +} + +static const struct of_device_id stm32_pcie_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "st,stm32mp25-pcie-rc" }, + {}, +}; + +static struct platform_driver stm32_pcie_driver = { + .probe = stm32_pcie_probe, + .remove = stm32_pcie_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "stm32-pcie", + .of_match_table = stm32_pcie_of_match, + .pm = &stm32_pcie_pm_ops,Just use a single space instead of tab. Could you also set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS to allow async probing of controller drivers?
OK
quoted
+ }, +}; + +static bool is_stm32_pcie_driver(struct device *dev) +{ + /* PCI bridge */ + dev = get_device(dev); + + /* Platform driver */ + dev = get_device(dev->parent); + + return (dev->driver == &stm32_pcie_driver.driver); +} + +/* + * DMA masters can only access the first 4GB of memory space, + * so we setup the bus DMA limit accordingly. + */ +static int stm32_dma_limit(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) +{ + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "disabling DMA DAC for device"); + + pdev->dev.bus_dma_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); + + return 0; +} + +static void quirk_stm32_dma_mask(struct pci_dev *pci) +{ + struct pci_dev *root_port; + + root_port = pcie_find_root_port(pci); + + if (root_port && is_stm32_pcie_driver(root_port->dev.parent)) + pci_walk_bus(pci->bus, stm32_dma_limit, NULL); +} +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS, 0x0550, quirk_stm32_dma_mask);This is not the correct way of using DMA masks as Bjorn noted.
Yes, fixed will dma-ranges thanks Christian
- Mani