On 05/09/2024 06:42, Jingyi Wang wrote:

On 9/4/2024 5:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 04/09/2024 10:33, Jingyi Wang wrote:

quoted

Document the QCS8275/QCS8300 SoC and its reference board QCS8300 RIDE.
QCS8300 is an Industrial Safe SoC, while QCS8275 is the Industrial
Non-Safe version which can share the same SoC dtsi and board DTS.

Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
index c0529486810f..ccf9a166368f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml

@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ description: |
         msm8996
         msm8998
         qcs404
+        qcs8275
+        qcs8300
         qcs8550
         qcm2290
         qcm6490

@@ -895,6 +897,12 @@ properties:
           - const: qcom,qcs404-evb
           - const: qcom,qcs404
 
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - qcom,qcs8300-ride
+          - const: qcom,qcs8275

So the qcs8300 ride comes with non-safe SoC?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Both QCS8275 and QCS8300 SoC can reference qcs8300 ride board. Could you
describe your suggestion in more detail?

I did not suggest anything. I am confused that you claim that every
qcs8300 is using the non-safe flavor of the SoC. I am fine with this but
I want to understand it and be sure you will not change it next month
when you learn what this means.

Best regards,
Krzysztof