Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 6 authors, 2024-08-27

Re: [PATCH v3 02/17] drm/bridge: Verify lane assignment is going to work during atomic_check

From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-20 17:24:49
Also in: chrome-platform, dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-patches, linux-usb, lkml

Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-08-20 10:17:46)
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:12:55AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-08-20 03:09:29)
quoted
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:38:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
+     /*
+      * Ensure this bridge is aware that the next bridge wants to
+      * reassign lanes.
+      */
+     for (i = 0; i < num_input_lanes; i++)
+             if (i != input_lanes[i].logical && !num_output_lanes)
+                     return -ENOTSUPP;
Besides missing {} this code is internal to the Linux kernel. Is it okay?
ENOTSUPP is used by select_bus_fmt_recursive() so I simply followed that
style.
Okay, just be aware of that side effect of that code, also checkpatch may
complain (however it might be false positive).
Yes checkpatch complained but didn't enlighten me. Please tell me the
side effect as I'm unaware!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help