Re: [PATCH 0/4] Use reg instead of ti,bit-shift for clksel

On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:56:40 +0200
Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi all,

This series updates the clksel clocks to use the standard reg property
instead of ti,bit-shift.

I'd like to apply these before we make further use of the clksel clocks
to reduce the dtb check warnings.

hmm, we still have ti,bit-shift if these clocks are not used below a ti,clksel.
Just wondering, can we completely deorbit ti,bit-shift if we used #address-cells = <2>;
in those cases? I wait a bit with further txt->yaml conversions until
this is settled.

Regards,
Andreas