On 16/02/2024 13:48, Shreeya Patel wrote:
On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote:
quoted
Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller.
Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <redacted>
---
drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c | 1 +
include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++
Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some
warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix.
Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear.
Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you:
YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch
with errors to the mailing list?
I am sorry but what errors are you talking about?
I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :-
shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch
WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
Here.
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review.
I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me.
Why for your patch it would be false positive and for all others would not?
Best regards,
Krzysztof