Re: [PATCH v1 06/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: add USBDP phys on rk3588
From: Johan Jonker <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-12 22:51:12
Also in:
linux-phy, linux-rockchip, lkml
On 2/12/24 19:48, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Hi Johan, On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 08:24:36PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:quoted
quoted
+ u2phy1: usb2-phy@4000 {"usb2phy@[0-9a-f]+$":Interesting. I would have expected that to pop up in dtbs_check, but it does not for some reason. I will fix it for all usb2phy instances in rk3588.quoted
quoted
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-usb2phy"; + reg = <0x4000 0x10>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 394 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;quoted
+ resets = <&cru SRST_OTGPHY_U3_1>, <&cru SRST_P_USB2PHY_U3_1_GRF0>; + reset-names = "phy", "apb"; + clocks = <&cru CLK_USB2PHY_HDPTXRXPHY_REF>; + clock-names = "phyclk"; + clock-output-names = "usb480m_phy1"; + #clock-cells = <0>;Align with the (new) documentation about property ordering.quoted
+ status = "disabled"; + + u2phy1_otg: otg-port { + #phy-cells = <0>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + }; + };The above follows everything from [0], which does not specify an order for the "standard/common properties". For those this follows the order of existing usb2phy nodes. Did I miss any other new Documentation? [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html#order-of-properties-in-device-node
While reading the text below I think it's in need for a clarification that the property order for common and vendor category is alpha-numerical as is for nodes.
For Rockchip DT in this case "reset*" below "clock*", so that the person after you can add properties in a sort list.
Johan
.===
The following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:
"compatible"
"reg"
"ranges"
Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without vendor-prefixes)
Vendor-specific properties
"status" (if applicable)
Child nodes, where each node is preceded with a blank line
The "status" property is by default "okay", thus it can be omitted.
-- Sebastian