Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 5 authors, 2024-01-24

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2024-01-16 14:13:56
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, linux-um, lkml

Hi Mark,

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:51 PM Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:07:44PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB
on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB.
There's no harm in calling unflatten_device_tree() unconditionally.
For better or worse, that's not true: there are systems the provide both a DTB
*and* ACPI tables, and we must not consume both at the same time as those can
clash and cause all sorts of problems. In addition, we don't want people being
"clever" and describing disparate portions of their system in ACPI and DT.
We'd get to the latter anyway, when plugging in a USB device where the
circuitry on/behind the USB device is described in DT.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help