Re: [PATCH v12 5/7] media: chips-media: wave5: Add the v4l2 layer
From: Ivan Bornyakov <hidden>
Date: 2023-09-16 20:37:53
Hi, Sebastian, On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 23:11:34 +0200, Sebastian Fricke wrote:
From: Nas Chung <nas.chung@chipsnmedia.com> Add the decoder and encoder implementing the v4l2 API. This patch also adds the Makefile and the VIDEO_WAVE_VPU config Signed-off-by: Sebastian Fricke <redacted> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <redacted> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <redacted> Signed-off-by: Nas Chung <nas.chung@chipsnmedia.com>
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a13d968f5d04 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
[...]
+static void wave5_vpu_get_interrupt_for_inst(struct vpu_instance *inst, u32 status)
+{
+ struct vpu_device *dev = inst->dev;
+ u32 seq_done;
+ u32 cmd_done;
+ int val;
+
+ seq_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO);
+ cmd_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST);
+
+ if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ)) {
+ if (seq_done & BIT(inst->id)) {
+ seq_done &= ~BIT(inst->id);
+ wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO, seq_done);
+ val = BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ);
+ kfifo_in(&inst->irq_status, &val, sizeof(int));
+ }
+ }
+ if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM)) {
+ if (seq_done & BIT(inst->id)) {
+ seq_done &= ~BIT(inst->id);
+ wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO, seq_done);
+ val = BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM);
+ kfifo_in(&inst->irq_status, &val, sizeof(int));
+ }
+ }
+ if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_DEC_PIC) ||
+ status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_PIC)) {
+ if (cmd_done & BIT(inst->id)) {
+ cmd_done &= ~BIT(inst->id);
+ wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST, cmd_done);
+ val = BIT(INT_WAVE5_DEC_PIC);
+ kfifo_in(&inst->irq_status, &val, sizeof(int));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t wave5_vpu_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct vpu_device *dev = dev_id;
+
+ if (wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VPU_INT_STS)) {
+ struct vpu_instance *inst;
+ u32 irq_status = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(inst, &dev->instances, list) {
+ wave5_vpu_get_interrupt_for_inst(inst, irq_status);
+ }
+
+ wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON_CLR, irq_status);
+ wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_CLEAR, 0x1);
+
+ return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+ }
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t wave5_vpu_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct vpu_device *dev = dev_id;
+ struct vpu_instance *inst;
+ int irq_status, ret;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(inst, &dev->instances, list) {
+ while (kfifo_len(&inst->irq_status)) {
+ ret = kfifo_out(&inst->irq_status, &irq_status, sizeof(int));
+ if (!ret)
+ break;
+
+ if (irq_status == BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ) ||
+ irq_status == BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM))
+ complete(&inst->irq_done);
+ else /* DEC/ENC_PIC */
+ inst->ops->finish_process(inst);
+
+ wave5_vpu_clear_interrupt(inst, irq_status);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
I believe, instead of
wave5_vpu_irq() + wave5_vpu_get_interrupt_for_inst() + wave5_vpu_irq_thread()
you can reduce interrupt handling to only threaded part with something like this:
static irqreturn_t wave5_vpu_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
u32 irq_status, seq_done, cmd_done;
struct vpu_device *dev = dev_id;
struct vpu_instance *inst;
while (wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VPU_INT_STS)) {
irq_status = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON);
seq_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO);
cmd_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST);
list_for_each_entry(inst, &dev->instances, list) {
if (irq_status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ) ||
irq_status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM)) {
if (seq_done & BIT(inst->id)) {
seq_done &= ~BIT(inst->id);
wave5_vdi_write_register(dev,
W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO,
seq_done);
complete(&inst->irq_done);
}
}
if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_DEC_PIC) ||
status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_PIC)) {
if (cmd_done & BIT(inst->id)) {
cmd_done &= ~BIT(inst->id);
wave5_vdi_write_register(dev,
W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST,
cmd_done);
inst->ops->finish_process(inst);
}
}
wave5_vpu_clear_interrupt(inst, irq_status);
}
wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON_CLR, irq_status);
wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_CLEAR, 0x1);
}
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
Is it better?
[...]
+static int wave5_vpu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct vpu_device *dev;
+ const struct wave5_match_data *match_data;
+ u32 fw_revision;
+
+ match_data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!match_data) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing device match data\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* physical addresses limited to 32 bits */
+ dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));dma_set_mask_and_coherent()? Also error check?