On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 09:26:49AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 04/09/2023 06:05, Linu Cherian wrote:
quoted
memory-region 0: Reserved trace buffer memory
TMC ETR: When available, use this reserved memory region for
trace data capture. Same region is used for trace data
retention after a panic or watchdog reset.
TMC ETF: When available, use this reserved memory region for
trace data retention synced from internal SRAM after a panic or
watchdog reset.
memory-region 1: Reserved meta data memory
TMC ETR, ETF: When available, use this memory for register
snapshot retention synced from hardware registers after a panic
or watchdog reset.
Instead of having to use a number to map the memory regions, could
we use
memory-region-names property to describe the index ? That way it
is much easier to read and is less error prone.
You can, but the order should still be defined.
Names could be something like:
tmc-reserved-trace
tmc-reserved-metadata
Names are local to the binding. So 'tmc' is redundant. And everything is
a reserved region for 'memory-region', so that's redundant too.
Rob