Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 6 authors, 2023-08-12

Re: [PATCH v7 02/15] of: property: Add fw_devlink support for msi-parent

From: Saravana Kannan <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-11 21:00:32
Also in: linux-riscv, lkml

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:39 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
quoted
This allows fw_devlink to create device links between consumers of
a MSI and the supplier of the MSI.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <redacted>
---
 drivers/of/property.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index ddc75cd50825..bc20535deed7 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -1325,6 +1325,37 @@ static struct device_node *parse_interrupts(struct device_node *np,
      return of_irq_parse_one(np, index, &sup_args) ? NULL : sup_args.np;
 }

+static struct device_node *parse_msi_parent(struct device_node *np,
+                                         const char *prop_name, int index)
+{
+     struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
+     struct device_node *msi_np;
+
+     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARC))
+             return NULL;
+
+     if (strcmp(prop_name, "msi-parent"))
+             return NULL;
+
+     msi_np = of_parse_phandle(np, prop_name, 0);
+     if (msi_np) {
+             if (!of_property_read_bool(msi_np, "#msi-cells")) {
Use of_property_present() to check presence.

However, this check is wrong. #msi-cells is optional and assumed to be 0
if not present. There's another flavor of of_parse_phandle_with_args()
that allows specifying a default cell count, so I think you can get rid
of all this checking.
Rob,

The existing DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP() already does this btw. See commit
ff24fed10ba41. Anup just ignores review comments.

Anup,

Saw your reply here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK9=C2W+3pOWL36ZPme1LpHz5PEBVdKWv+kR7DYKmRyw1AymMA@mail.gmail.com/ (local)

Did you even try the macro? Why are you so hell bent on wasting our
time by ignoring code review comments and sending the same useless
patch?

-Saravana
quoted
+                     if (index) {
+                             of_node_put(msi_np);
+                             return NULL;
+                     }
+                     return msi_np;
+             }
+             of_node_put(msi_np);
+     }
+
+     if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, prop_name, "#msi-cells", index,
+                                    &sup_args))
+             return NULL;
+
+     return sup_args.np;
+}
+
 static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
      { .parse_prop = parse_clocks, },
      { .parse_prop = parse_interconnects, },
@@ -1359,6 +1390,7 @@ static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
      { .parse_prop = parse_regulators, },
      { .parse_prop = parse_gpio, },
      { .parse_prop = parse_gpios, },
+     { .parse_prop = parse_msi_parent, },
      {}
 };

--
2.34.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help