Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:12, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:14:55)

quoted

On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded
into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.

As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit
if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other
architectures.

That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real
topic for bikeshedding is the name.
- Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name?
- Do we want to include the architecture in the name?
Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?

I think I will drop this patch. I have overlays working. I hijacked
of_core_init() to load the testcase data from drivers/of/unittest-data
and made a container node for kunit overlays to apply to.

Makes sense to me, thanks!

Looking forward to seeing how the overlays work in practice!