On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
quoted
Hello Rob,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:14:55PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:55:23 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
quoted
Add "rockchip,rk3588-pwm" compatible string for PWM nodes found
on a rk3588 platform.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <redacted>
---
No driver changes required.
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.
Is this a list of *new* warnings, or is the report (somewhat) orthogonal
to the actual change and you just used the opportunity that someone
touched the pwm-rockchip binding to point out that there is some cleanup
to do?
quoted
Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
Hm, that gives me a 404.
This is an existing problem with the rv1108 binding.
The rk3588 does not have pwm interrupts.
I thought so, so:
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |