Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] clk: mediatek: clk-mt8195-mfg: Reparent mfg_bg3d and propagate rate changes
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Date: 2022-09-26 08:57:37
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 4:36 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [off-list ref] wrote:
Il 26/09/22 05:27, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:quoted
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:25 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The MFG_BG3D is a gate to enable/disable clock output to the GPU, but the actual output is decided by multiple muxes; in particular: mfg_ck_fast_ref muxes between "slow" (top_mfg_core_tmp) and "fast" (MFGPLL) clock, while top_mfg_core_tmp muxes between the 26MHz clock and various system PLLs. This also implies that "top_mfg_core_tmp" is a parent of the "mfg_ck_fast_ref" mux (and not vice-versa), so reparent theI don't see where this was the case though? I think what you meant was that the direct parent for "mfg_bg3d" is "mfg_ck_fast_ref, not "top_mfg_core_tmp"?MFG_BG3D's direct parent is mfg_ck_fast_ref - yes - but in the commit message I am explaining how the clock tree for MFG_BG3D really is and, in particular, I'm then explaining that: * parenting MFG_BG3D to "top_mfg_core_tmp" is wrong; because * "top_mfg_core_tmp" is a parent of "mfg_ck_fast_ref" (not the other way around). So, the question in your comment is addressed just a little later....quoted
quoted
MFG_BG3D gate to the latter and add the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT...here, where I say "reparent MFG_BG3D to the latter", where "the latter" is, exactly "mfg_ck_fast_ref". I hope you now understand what I am trying to communicate :-) However, if even after that you still think that the commit description should be rewritten in some less tangled and/or more understandable way, I definitely can do that. Please confirm :-)
I think
This also implies that "top_mfg_core_tmp" is a parent of the
"mfg_ck_fast_ref" mux (and not vice-versa)
actually confused me.
Maybe just say
The clock gate comes after all the muxes, so its parent is
mfg_ck_fast_ref, not top_mfg_core_tmp. Reparent mfg_bg3d to
the latter to match the hardware ...
Since you are fixing the topology, could you also add a fixes tag?
Thanks
ChenYu
quoted
quoted
flag to it: this way we ensure propagating rate changes that are requested on MFG_BG3D along its entire clock tree. Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>quoted
--- drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-mfg.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-mfg.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-mfg.c index 9411c556a5a9..c94cb71bd9b9 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-mfg.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-mfg.c@@ -17,10 +17,12 @@ static const struct mtk_gate_regs mfg_cg_regs = { }; #define GATE_MFG(_id, _name, _parent, _shift) \ - GATE_MTK(_id, _name, _parent, &mfg_cg_regs, _shift, &mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr) + GATE_MTK_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parent, &mfg_cg_regs, \ + _shift, &mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr, \ + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) static const struct mtk_gate mfg_clks[] = { - GATE_MFG(CLK_MFG_BG3D, "mfg_bg3d", "top_mfg_core_tmp", 0), + GATE_MFG(CLK_MFG_BG3D, "mfg_bg3d", "mfg_ck_fast_ref", 0), }; static const struct mtk_clk_desc mfg_desc = { --2.37.2