On 17/08/2022 11:47, Samuel Holland wrote:

On 8/16/22 4:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 15/08/2022 07:34, Samuel Holland wrote:

quoted

Some sunxi SoCs have in-package regulators controlled by a register in
the system control MMIO block. Allow a child node for these regulators
in addition to SRAM child nodes.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
---

Changes in v3:
 - Require the regulators node to have a unit address
 - Reference the regulator schema from the SRAM controller schema
 - Move the system LDOs example to the SRAM controller schema
 - Reorder the patches so the example passes validation

Changes in v2:
 - New patch for v2

 .../allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml   | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml
index d64c1b28fb61..915ca85c3f10 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/allwinner,sun4i-a10-system-control.yaml

@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ properties:
   ranges: true
 
 patternProperties:
+  "^regulators@[0-9a-f]+$":
+    $ref: /schemas/regulator/allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos.yaml#
+    unevaluatedProperties: false

unevaluatedProperties is not needed. Your other schema does not allow
anything else here.

I can remove it. I added it because it looks like the dt-schema tools use it as
an indicator that the matched properties are child nodes[1]. Maybe that is not
relevant here?

It is not relevant here as the other schema does not allow anything else.

Best regards,
Krzysztof