Re: [PATCH 2/2] power: supply: rt9471: Add Richtek RT9471 charger driver
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-08-15 07:24:49
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
ma 15. elok. 2022 klo 9.11 ChiYuan Huang (u0084500@gmail.com) kirjoitti:
Matti Vaittinen [off-list ref] 於 2022年8月15日 週一 下午1:53寫道:quoted
Hi ChiYuan, Thanks for the patch :) to 11. elok. 2022 klo 16.43 cy_huang (u0084500@gmail.com) kirjoitti:quoted
From: ChiYuan Huang <redacted> Add support for the RT9471 3A 1-Cell Li+ battery charger. The RT9471 is a highly-integrated 3A switch mode battery charger with low impedance power path to better optimize the charging efficiency. Co-developed-by: Alina Yu <redacted> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <redacted> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <redacted> ---
quoted
While skimming through the rest of the patch... This may just be my personal preference but wrapper functions with just one line are rarely beneficial. In the worst case they just add more lines AND hide the details of what actually is done without any clear benefits. Well, this is just my view so please ignore this comment if wrappers like this are a "subsystem standard"I'm not sure what the 'subsystem standard' is. I declare it as 'inline' function and the function name to tell the user what I'm doing. This may be silly. But from my aspect, it makes each property set/get more clear.
I guess this is Ok if the maintainer does not complain. And if he does - then we at least know the "subsystem standard" ;) Yours -- Matti -- Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~