Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 7 authors, 2022-07-12

Re: [PATCH 01/10] input: keyboard: adp5588-keys: support gpi key events as 'gpio keys'

From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-09 11:53:19
Also in: linux-gpio, linux-input, oe-kbuild-all

On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 6:22 AM kernel test robot [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi "Nuno,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on dtor-input/next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20220708]
[cannot apply to brgl/gpio/for-next hid/for-next linus/master v5.19-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nuno-S/adp5588-keys-refactor-and-fw-properties-support/20220708-173730
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git next
config: x86_64-randconfig-a013 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220709/202207091223.nBzeL6dk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/64267ff775fd4b945fb916a10187be1c15faa165
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Nuno-S/adp5588-keys-refactor-and-fw-properties-support/20220708-173730
        git checkout 64267ff775fd4b945fb916a10187be1c15faa165
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c: In function 'adp5588_gpio_add':
quoted
quoted
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c:263:18: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named 'of_node'; did you mean 'fwnode'?
     263 |         kpad->gc.of_node = kpad->client->dev.of_node;
         |                  ^~~~~~~
         |                  fwnode
Yes, exactly the point why of_node is bad to have. In legacy code like
this you need to guard access to it with #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO IIRC.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help