Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: adc-joystick: add poll-interval
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-06-30 15:08:29
Also in:
linux-iio, linux-input
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:48 PM Paul Cercueil [off-list ref] wrote:
Le lun., juin 27 2022 at 17:41:37 -0500, Chris Morgan [off-list ref] a écrit :quoted
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:33:28PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:quoted
Hi Chris, Le lun., juin 27 2022 at 17:14:42 -0500, Chris Morgan [off-list ref] a écrit : > Add poll-interval support for the adc-joystick documentation. This is > an optional value and if not provided the adc-joystick works as it > does today (with triggered buffers). If this value is provided, the > adc-joystick driver is polled at the specified interval. > > Signed-off-by: Maya Matuszczyk [off-list ref] > Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan [off-list ref] > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml > index 2ee04e03bc22..2d755091e46d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml > @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ properties: > compatible: > const: adc-joystick > > + poll-interval: > + description: > + Poll interval time in milliseconds. If not specified, device will > use > + triggered buffer. It doesn't have to use *triggered* buffer - it can use regular buffer as well. The property should use a unit suffix, as explained here: https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdevicetree-org%2Fdt-schema%2Fblob%2Fmain%2Fdtschema%2Fschemas%2Fproperty-units.yaml&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cf6306210eda84b58f7f408da588d1627%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637919660856597552%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NVqhWKdycQsv0ksiILD8aH%2BnZ6aji%2BhNxSEwBkQlZC0%3D&reserved=0 So it should be named poll-interval-ms. Cheers, -PaulUnderstood, though the logic here was to be consistent with existing implementations (such as adc-keys and gpio-keys-polled) which all use poll-interval (no ms). Honest question, would it be better to be right (poll-interval-ms) or consistent (poll-interval) in this case?I guess those don't have a suffix for legacy reasons, and newly introduced properties should follow the standard. But I guess that's a question for DT maintainers.
It should be consistent with the rest of the input bindings. Rob