Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2022-07-04

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: exynosautov9: correct clock numbering of peric0/c1

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-28 10:02:53
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc

On 28/06/2022 04:15, Chanho Park wrote:
quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: exynosautov9: correct clock
numbering of peric0/c1

On 27/06/2022 02:52, Chanho Park wrote:
quoted
There are duplicated definitions of peric0 and peric1 cmu blocks.
Thus, they should be defined correctly as numerical order.

Fixes: 680e1c8370a2 ("dt-bindings: clock: add clock binding
definitions for Exynos Auto v9")
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <redacted>
---
 .../dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h  | 56
+++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
index ea9f91b4eb1a..a7db6516593f 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
@@ -226,21 +226,21 @@
 #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_8		28
 #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_9		29
 #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_10	30
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11	30
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0		31
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1		32
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_2		33
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_3		34
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_4		35
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_5		36
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_6		37
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_7		38
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_8		39
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_9		40
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_10		41
-#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_11		42
+#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11	31
+#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0		32
+#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1		33
Is this a fix for current cycle? If yes, it's ok, otherwise all other IDs
should not be changed, because it's part of ABI.
What is the current cycle? 5.19-rc or 5.20?
I prefer this goes on 5.19-rc but if it's not possible due to the ABI breakage, I'm okay this can be going to v5.20.
The change was introduced indeed in v5.19-rc1, so this should go to
current cycle as well (v5.19) and your patch is fine.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>

Sylwester or Stephen,

Please kindly grab it for fixes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help