On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 07:56:31PM +0800, ChiaEn Wu wrote:
From: ChiaEn Wu <redacted>
Add Mediatek MT6370 Backlight support.
Signed-off-by: ChiaEn Wu <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/Kconfig b/drivers/video/backlight/Kconfig
index a003e02..7cd823d 100644
<snip>
+static int mt6370_init_backlight_properties(struct mt6370_priv *priv,
+ struct backlight_properties *props)
+{
+ struct device *dev = priv->dev;
+ u8 prop_val;
+ u32 brightness, ovp_uV, ocp_uA;
+ unsigned int mask, val;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Vendor optional properties */
+ val = 0;
+ if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "mediatek,bled-pwm-enable"))
+ val |= MT6370_BL_PWM_EN_MASK;
+
+ if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "mediatek,bled-pwm-hys-enable"))
+ val |= MT6370_BL_PWM_HYS_EN_MASK;
+
+ ret = device_property_read_u8(dev,
+ "mediatek,bled-pwm-hys-input-th-steps",
+ &prop_val);
+ if (!ret) {
+ prop_val = clamp_val(prop_val,
+ MT6370_BL_PWM_HYS_TH_MIN_STEP,
+ MT6370_BL_PWM_HYS_TH_MAX_STEP);
+ /*
+ * prop_val = 1 --> 1 steps --> 0x00
+ * prop_val = 2 ~ 4 --> 4 steps --> 0x01
+ * prop_val = 5 ~ 16 --> 16 steps --> 0x10
+ * prop_val = 17 ~ 64 --> 64 steps --> 0x11
^^^^^
These numbers are binary, not hex, right? If so, the comments
should be 0b00 to 0b03 .
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ */
+ prop_val = (ilog2(roundup_pow_of_two(prop_val)) + 1) >> 1;
+ val |= prop_val << (ffs(MT6370_BL_PWM_HYS_SEL_MASK) - 1);
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MT6370_REG_BL_PWM,
+ val, val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
Overall, I like this approach! Easy to read and understand.
<snip>
+static int mt6370_bl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct mt6370_priv *priv;
+ struct backlight_properties props = {
+ .type = BACKLIGHT_RAW,
+ .scale = BACKLIGHT_SCALE_LINEAR,
Sorry, I missed this before but the KConfig comment says that the
backlight can support both linear and exponential curves.
Is there a good reason to default to linear?
Daniel.