Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2022-03-15

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: Add clock-output-names for omap4

From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-03-11 03:34:42
Also in: linux-clk, linux-omap

Quoting Tony Lindgren (2022-02-04 00:43:35)
To stop using the non-standard node name based clock naming, let's
first add the clock-output-names property. This allows us to stop using
the internal legacy clock naming and unify the naming for the TI SoCs in
the following patches.

Note that we must wait on fixing the node naming issues until after the
internal clock names have been updated to avoid adding name translation
unnecessarily.

Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
I assume I don't merge this through clk tree.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x-clocks.dtsi |   1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap446x-clocks.dtsi |   2 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 168 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x-clocks.dtsi
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x-clocks.dtsi
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ &prm_clocks {
        bandgap_fclk: bandgap_fclk@1888 {
                #clock-cells = <0>;
                compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
+               clock-output-names = "bandgap_fclk";
At this point clock-output-names is basically a debug feature. It would
be better to use clocks property in consumer nodes and then use
clk_parent_data to link up the clk tree. Not sure if that matters here
though? I can understand the desire to have "usable" names vs. some
not very useful name be auto generated..
                clocks = <&sys_32k_ck>;
                ti,bit-shift = <8>;
                reg = <0x1888>;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help