On 27/02/2022 22:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

On 27/02/2022 13:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 26/02/2022 21:09, Marijn Suijten wrote:

quoted

From: Martin Botka <redacted>

Add device tree bindings for display clock controller for
Qualcomm Technology Inc's SM6125 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <redacted>
---
  .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml    | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
  .../dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h    | 41 +++++++++
  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3465042d0d9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm Display Clock Controller Binding for SM6125
+
+maintainers:
+  - Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
+
+description: |
+  Qualcomm display clock control module which supports the clocks and
+  power domains on SM6125.
+
+  See also:
+    dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - qcom,sm6125-dispcc
+
+  clocks:
+    items:
+      - description: Board XO source
+      - description: Byte clock from DSI PHY0
+      - description: Pixel clock from DSI PHY0
+      - description: Pixel clock from DSI PHY1
+      - description: Link clock from DP PHY
+      - description: VCO DIV clock from DP PHY
+      - description: AHB config clock from GCC
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: bi_tcxo
+      - const: dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk
+      - const: dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk
+      - const: dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk
+      - const: dp_phy_pll_link_clk
+      - const: dp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk
+      - const: cfg_ahb_clk
+
+  '#clock-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  '#power-domain-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+  - '#clock-cells'
+  - '#power-domain-cells'
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm6125.h>
+    clock-controller@5f00000 {
+      compatible = "qcom,sm6125-dispcc";
+      reg = <0x5f00000 0x20000>;
+      clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
+               <&dsi0_phy 0>,
+               <&dsi0_phy 1>,
+               <0>,

This does not look like a valid phandle. This clock is required, isn't it?

Not, it's not required for general dispcc support.
dispcc uses DSI and DP PHY clocks to provide respective pixel/byte/etc 
clocks. However if support for DP is not enabled, the dispcc can work 
w/o DP phy clock. Thus we typically add 0 phandles as placeholders for 
DSI/DP clock sources and populate them as support for respective 
interfaces gets implemented.

Then the clock is optional, isn't it? While not modeling it as optional?


Best regards,
Krzysztof