Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 2 authors, 2022-02-24
STALE1613d

[PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: opp: Add "opp-microwatt" entry in the OPP

From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date: 2022-02-24 08:12:40
Also in: linux-pm, lkml
Subsystem: open firmware and flattened device tree bindings, operating performance points (opp), the rest · Maintainers: Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Viresh Kumar, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, Linus Torvalds

Add new entry for the OPP which provides information about power
expressed in micro-Watts. It is useful for the Energy Model framework.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml      | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
index 15a76bcd6d42..433164186a98 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
@@ -93,6 +93,21 @@ patternProperties:
         minItems: 1
         maxItems: 8   # Should be enough regulators
 
+      opp-microwatt:
+        description: |
+          The power for the OPP in micro-Watts.
+
+          Entries for multiple regulators shall be provided in the same field
+          separated by angular brackets <>. If current values aren't required
+          for a regulator, then it shall be filled with 0. If power values
+          aren't required for any of the regulators, then this field is not
+          required. The OPP binding doesn't provide any provisions to relate the
+          values to their power supplies or the order in which the supplies need
+          to be configured and that is left for the implementation specific
+          binding.
+        minItems: 1
+        maxItems: 8   # Should be enough regulators
+
       opp-level:
         description:
           A value representing the performance level of the device.
-- 
2.17.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help