Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: ti: Introduce base support for AM62x SoC
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Date: 2022-02-10 19:35:14
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 19:10-20220209, Marc Zyngier wrote: [...]
quoted
+&cbass_main { + gic500: interrupt-controller@1800000 { + compatible = "arm,gic-v3"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + #interrupt-cells = <3>; + interrupt-controller; + reg = <0x00 0x01800000 0x00 0x10000>, /* GICD */ + <0x00 0x01880000 0x00 0xC0000>; /* GICR */Usual rant: you are missing the GICC, GICH and GICV regions that are implemented by the CPU. Cortex-A53 implements them (they are not optional), so please describe them.
-ECONFUSED. TRM for GIC500 refers to just GICD, GICR and ITS range[1]. Same thing is indicated by Generic Interrupt Controller Architecture Specification[2] See table 1-1 (page 23). I think you are expecting GICV3's backward compatibility mode (Table 1-2 in page 24), But in K3 architecture, are_option meant for backward compatibility is set to true (aka no backward compatibility). I think this did popup sometime back as well (first k3 SoC)[3]. I think the more clearer description is available in [4]. I believe the argumentation that GICC/H/V is mandatory for A53 if GIC500 is used is not accurate. Please correct me if I am mistaken. [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0516/e/programmers-model/the-gic-500-register-map?lang=en [2] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0069/d [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20180607233853.p7iw7nlxxuyi66og@kahuna/ [4] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0516/e/functional-description/operation/backwards-compatibility?lang=en -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D