Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] clk: microchip: Add driver for Microchip PolarFire SoC
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-12-16 10:12:12
Also in:
linux-clk
Hi Conor, On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:41 AM [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com> Add support for clock configuration on Microchip PolarFire SoC Co-developed-by: Padmarao Bengari <redacted> Signed-off-by: Padmarao Bengari <redacted> Signed-off-by: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com> Co-developed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Thanks for the update!
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
+static void mpfs_clk_unregister_cfg(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ devm_clk_hw_unregister(dev, hw);Just call devm_clk_hw_unregister() directly from the caller?
+}
+static int mpfs_clk_register_cfgs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock *cfg_hws,
+ unsigned int num_clks, struct mpfs_clock_data *data)
+{
+ struct clk_hw *hw;
+ struct clk *clk_parent;
+ void __iomem *sys_base = data->base;
+ unsigned int i, id;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
+ struct mpfs_cfg_hw_clock *cfg_hw = &cfg_hws[i];
+
+ clk_parent = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);Please get the clock once, in mpfs_clk_probe()...
+ if (IS_ERR(clk_parent)) + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
... and propagate the actual error.
+
+ cfg_hw->cfg.parent = __clk_get_hw(clk_parent);
+ cfg_hw->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW(cfg_hw->cfg.name, cfg_hw->cfg.parent,
+ &mpfs_clk_cfg_ops, cfg_hw->cfg.flags);
+ hw = mpfs_clk_register_cfg(dev, cfg_hw, sys_base);
+ if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to register clock %s\n", cfg_hw->cfg.name);
+ goto err_clk;
+ }
+
+ id = cfg_hws[i].cfg.id;
+ data->hw_data.hws[id] = hw;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_clk:
+ while (i--)
+ mpfs_clk_unregister_cfg(dev, data->hw_data.hws[cfg_hws[i].cfg.id]);
+
+ return PTR_ERR(hw);
+}+static struct mpfs_periph_hw_clock mpfs_periph_clks[] = {
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_ENVM, "clk_periph_envm", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 0, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MAC0, "clk_periph_mac0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 1, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MAC1, "clk_periph_mac1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 2, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMC, "clk_periph_mmc", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 3, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_TIMER, "clk_periph_timer", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 4, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART0, "clk_periph_mmuart0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 5, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART1, "clk_periph_mmuart1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 6, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART2, "clk_periph_mmuart2", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 7, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART3, "clk_periph_mmuart3", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 8, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART4, "clk_periph_mmuart4", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 9, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_SPI0, "clk_periph_spi0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 10, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_SPI1, "clk_periph_spi1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 11, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_I2C0, "clk_periph_i2c0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 12, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_I2C1, "clk_periph_i2c1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 13, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_CAN0, "clk_periph_can0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 14, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_CAN1, "clk_periph_can1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 15, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_USB, "clk_periph_usb", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 16, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_RTC, "clk_periph_rtc", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 18, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_QSPI, "clk_periph_qspi", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 19, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_GPIO0, "clk_periph_gpio0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 20, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_GPIO1, "clk_periph_gpio1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 21, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_GPIO2, "clk_periph_gpio2", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 22, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_DDRC, "clk_periph_ddrc", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 23, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_FIC0, "clk_periph_fic0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 24, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_FIC1, "clk_periph_fic1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 25, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_FIC2, "clk_periph_fic2", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 26, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_FIC3, "clk_periph_fic3", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 27, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),Why were the ficN clocks changed to critical clocks? it seemed to work fine without that before?
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_ATHENA, "clk_periph_athena", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 28, 0),
+ CLK_PERIPH(CLK_CFM, "clk_periph_cfm", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 29, 0),
+};
+
+static void mpfs_clk_unregister_periph(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ devm_clk_hw_unregister(dev, hw);Just call devm_clk_hw_unregister() directly from the caller?
+}
The above are minor comments, so
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds