Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2022-01-04

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: PL18x stop relying on order of dma-names

From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-28 16:58:41
Also in: linux-mmc, lkml

On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 20:25, David Heidelberg [off-list ref] wrote:
We don't care in which order are "rx" and "tx" DMA names supplied.

Fixes: 4df297aaeb9c ("dt-bindings: mmc: Add missing properties used in examples")

Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
Applied for next, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
index f0a44b2cfa79..a4f74bec68a3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
@@ -70,9 +70,13 @@ properties:
     maxItems: 2

   dma-names:
-    items:
-      - const: rx
-      - const: tx
+    oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - const: tx
+          - const: rx
+      - items:
+          - const: rx
+          - const: tx

   power-domains: true

--
2.34.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help