Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 4 authors, 2022-01-13

Re: [PATCH] um: virtio_uml: allow probing from devicetree

From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Date: 2021-12-22 11:11:46
Also in: linux-um, lkml

On 22/12/2021 10:34, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 09:48:26PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2021-12-21 at 10:04 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
quoted
Allow the virtio_uml device to be probed from the devicetree so that
sub-devices can be specified using the standard virtio bindings, for
example:

   virtio@1 {
     compatible = "virtio,uml";
     socket-path = "i2c.sock";
     virtio-device-id = <0x22>;
Given this, maybe it should modify
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/virtio-device.yaml? Or actually
add a new Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/uml.yaml I guess?

+Rob, because I'm not really into any of this.

Also, I'm not even sure we should/need to document the DT bits that are
basically only used for testing in the first place?
I wasn't sure either, but Rob was OK with not documenting some other
bindings which are only used for testing[0], so I assumed that that
applied here too:

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/5baa1ae6.1c69fb81.847f2.3ab1@mx.google.com/ (local)

Also, DT bindings are supposed to be generic and based on what the
hardware has, but here we have no hardware and something very Linux and
UML-specific.
This will probably need to be added to the general UML documentation. I 
will take care of that once the patches are in the tree.

Brgds,
quoted
Code looks good to me.
Thanks!

-- 
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
https://www.cambridgegreys.com/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help