Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2021-12-14

[PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: lan966x: Extend switchdev with vlan support

flat view
STALE1765d SUPERSEDED

From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Date: 2021-12-13 10:20:55
Also in: lkml, netdev
Subsystem: microchip lan966x ethernet driver, networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers: Horatiu Vultur, Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

Revision v4 of 5 in this series.

Revisions (5)
  1. v4 current
  2. v5 [diff vs current]
  3. v6 [diff vs current]
  4. v7 [diff vs current]
  5. v8 [diff vs current]
Implement the switchdev calls SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN and
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING.

Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
 .../microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c     | 117 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c
index 3f6d361ad65b..062b9fc80e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c
@@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ static int lan966x_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev, const void *ctx,
 	case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME:
 		lan966x_port_ageing_set(port, attr->u.ageing_time);
 		break;
+	case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING:
+		lan966x_vlan_port_set_vlan_aware(port, attr->u.vlan_filtering);
+		lan966x_vlan_port_apply(port);
+		lan966x_vlan_cpu_set_vlan_aware(port);
+		break;
 	default:
 		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		break;
@@ -343,6 +348,112 @@ static int lan966x_switchdev_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static int lan966x_handle_port_vlan_add(struct net_device *dev,
+					struct notifier_block *nb,
+					const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *v)
+{
+	struct lan966x_port *port;
+	struct lan966x *lan966x;
+
+	/* When adding a port to a vlan, we get a callback for the port but
+	 * also for the bridge. When get the callback for the bridge just bail
+	 * out. Then when the bridge is added to the vlan, then we get a
+	 * callback here but in this case the flags has set:
+	 * BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY. In this case it means that the CPU
+	 * port is added to the vlan, so the broadcast frames and unicast frames
+	 * with dmac of the bridge should be foward to CPU.
+	 */
+	if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev) &&
+	    !(v->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY))
+		return 0;
+
+	lan966x = container_of(nb, struct lan966x, switchdev_blocking_nb);
+
+	/* In case the port gets called */
+	if (!(netif_is_bridge_master(dev))) {
+		if (!lan966x_netdevice_check(dev))
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+		port = netdev_priv(dev);
+		return lan966x_vlan_port_add_vlan(port, v->vid,
+						  v->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID,
+						  v->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_UNTAGGED);
+	}
+
+	/* In case the bridge gets called */
+	if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev))
+		return lan966x_vlan_cpu_add_vlan(lan966x, dev, v->vid);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int lan966x_handle_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
+				       struct notifier_block *nb,
+				       struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *info)
+{
+	const struct switchdev_obj *obj = info->obj;
+	int err;
+
+	switch (obj->id) {
+	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
+		err = lan966x_handle_port_vlan_add(dev, nb,
+						   SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj));
+		break;
+	default:
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	info->handled = true;
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int lan966x_handle_port_vlan_del(struct net_device *dev,
+					struct notifier_block *nb,
+					const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *v)
+{
+	struct lan966x_port *port;
+	struct lan966x *lan966x;
+
+	lan966x = container_of(nb, struct lan966x, switchdev_blocking_nb);
+
+	/* In case the physical port gets called */
+	if (!netif_is_bridge_master(dev)) {
+		if (!lan966x_netdevice_check(dev))
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+		port = netdev_priv(dev);
+		return lan966x_vlan_port_del_vlan(port, v->vid);
+	}
+
+	/* In case the bridge gets called */
+	if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev))
+		return lan966x_vlan_cpu_del_vlan(lan966x, dev, v->vid);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int lan966x_handle_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
+				       struct notifier_block *nb,
+				       struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *info)
+{
+	const struct switchdev_obj *obj = info->obj;
+	int err;
+
+	switch (obj->id) {
+	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
+		err = lan966x_handle_port_vlan_del(dev, nb,
+						   SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj));
+		break;
+	default:
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	info->handled = true;
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int lan966x_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
 					    unsigned long event,
 					    void *ptr)
@@ -351,6 +462,12 @@ static int lan966x_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	int err;
 
 	switch (event) {
+	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD:
+		err = lan966x_handle_port_obj_add(dev, nb, ptr);
+		return notifier_from_errno(err);
+	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
+		err = lan966x_handle_port_obj_del(dev, nb, ptr);
+		return notifier_from_errno(err);
 	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET:
 		err = switchdev_handle_port_attr_set(dev, ptr,
 						     lan966x_netdevice_check,
-- 
2.33.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help