Hi Rob,

are you fine with these bindings?

On 02/12/2021 15:42, Ulf Hansson wrote:

On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 17:41, Daniel Lezcano [off-list ref] wrote:

[ ... ]

This looks good to me, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <redacted>

Kind regards
Uffe

quoted

---
   V3:
     - Removed required property 'compatible'
     - Removed powerzone-cells from the topmost node
     - Removed powerzone-cells from cpus 'consumers' in example
     - Set additionnal property to false
   V2:
     - Added pattern properties and stick to powerzone-*
     - Added required property compatible and powerzone-cells
     - Added additionnal property
     - Added compatible
     - Renamed to 'powerzones'
     - Added missing powerzone-cells to the topmost node
     - Fixed errors reported by 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
   V1: Initial post
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/power/powerzones.yaml | 97 +++++++++++++++++++

[ ... ]

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog