Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc: qcom: stats: Add fixed sleep stats offset for older RPM firmwares
From: Bjorn Andersson <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-18 20:58:57
Also in:
linux-arm-msm
On Thu 18 Nov 04:45 CST 2021, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:00:58PM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote:quoted
On Mon 18 Oct 06:08 CDT 2021, Stephan Gerhold wrote:quoted
Not all RPM firmware versions have the dynamic sleep stats offset available. Older versions use a fixed offset of 0xdba0. Add support for this using a new qcom,rpm-legacy-stats compatible that can be used for older SoCs like MSM8916. Suggested-by: Maulik Shah <redacted> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> --- drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_stats.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_stats.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_stats.c index 817505bd99b5..67728de718fd 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_stats.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_stats.c@@ -237,6 +237,15 @@ static const struct stats_config rpm_data = { .subsystem_stats_in_smem = false, }; +/* Older RPM firmwares have the stats at a fixed offset instead */ +static const struct stats_config rpm_legacy_data = { + .stats_offset = 0xdba0, + .num_records = 2, + .appended_stats_avail = true, + .dynamic_offset = false, + .subsystem_stats_in_smem = false, +};Is this the only variation that existed back in the "legacy" days? Will we end up with multiple "legacy" variants?I think most old platforms that are still somewhat maintained use 0xdba0 (e.g. MSM8916, MSM8974, APQ8084, MSM8226). I found a different offset for APQ8064, MSM8960, but they also seem to use a different stats format ("v1" instead of "v2") which is not currently supported by the qcom_stats driver here.
Okay, so there's an even more legacy format as well...
I guess I could add SoC-specific compatibles if you prefer (e.g. "qcom,rpm-stats-msm8916"), or do you have any other suggestion?
Yes, as we have examples of another "legacy format" I would prefer that we sprinkle some platform names in there; and as newer platforms all seems to use the same format this effort should be bound to whatever old platforms we end up supporting. Nit. I would prefer the qcom,msm8916-rpm-stats format though. Regards, Bjorn